
“At first glance, this field looks perfectly ordinary. Only when you look more closely does the picture become more complicated,” says Amelie Kreuzer.
The geographer is standing with her colleague Sonja Kay on the outskirts of Zurich (Switzerland), in front of a field of sunflowers. The plants are grown as green fodder for cattle and will later be made into silage.
Behind the sunflowers flows the Katzenbach. Straightened and confined to a channel more than a century ago, the stream looks unremarkable. But after heavy rain, it swells and bursts its banks. Then the field can turn into a lake overnight. The sunflower, forage maize or winter wheat harvest can quite literally be washed away.
For Amelie Kreuzer, the conclusion is clear: “There is nothing wrong with the way this land is being farmed. But because the Katzenbach regularly bursts its banks, it would make more sense to use this arable land as grassland.”

Are we using our land in the right way?
Amelie Kreuzer and Sonja Kay have examined which land uses are suited to which locations across Switzerland. The study was commissioned by the agricultural research centre Agroscope and the Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG).
The study’s findings point in two directions:
In the strictest scenario, only 58 per cent of today’s arable land meets all the site criteria examined. The remaining 42 per cent would be better classified as grassland.
Conversely, 26 per cent of today’s grassland has the potential to be used for arable farming.
“This isn’t about ploughing up Switzerland,” says Amelie Kreuzer. “It’s about taking a closer look at where growing crops really makes sense.”


